A new planning commissioner, 911 system grant, airport fees and a water and sewer ordinance will all be on the agenda for Wednesday's Ukiah City Council meeting.
The meeting is schedule to start at 6 p.m. in the Ukiah Civic Center.
New Councilmember Mary Anne Landis will have opportunity to name her replacement on the planning commission. Landis was chosen to fill former Councilmember John McCowen's seat. McCowen had appointed Landis to her seat on the commission.
The council is also expected to accept a grant from the state that will help revamp the ailing 911 system.
“Once every five years, the state of California awards 911 funds to upgrade and maintain dispatch center 911 telephone and computer equipment,” stated a portion of the agenda summary. “The current 911 system in our dispatch center is now over seven years old, two years past its serviceable life expectancy, is out of warranty and costing an additional $10,000 dollars a year to maintain, and is not compliant with new emergency 911 cell-phone and internet phone mandates. In addition, the current dispatch center infrastructure equipment is over 12 years old, and much of it must be replaced in order to support emergency dispatch operations.”
The council is also slated to award a bid to Clark Construction to install new security windows in the dispatch area.
At 6:15 p.m. the council is scheduled to take up a discussion and possible adoption of a resolution that would adjust user fees at the Ukiah Regional Airport.
“Prior to January 17, 2007 the airport user fees had not been increased in over eight years,” stated a portion of the agenda summary. “The lack of (consumer price index) increases has caused the airport individual hangars to become well under fair market value. In 2007, Council approved the former Airport Manager’s request for a 6 percent CPI increase to airport user fees be added every 2 years with Council approval...This report requests that: 1) the two-year 6 percent increase be approved; 2) that Council authorize an automatic annual CPI adjustment of 3 percent (which equates to the 6 percent every 2 years); and 3) that Council consider, at the request of the Airport Commission, the 3 percent CPI adjustment be increased by 1.5 percent for a total of 4.5 percent for the next five years.”
In the only item of unfinished business, the council is expected to take up a discussion and possible adoption of a water and sewer service fee ordinance for mobile home parks.
In summary, the proposed regulations would require the following if passed as written:
1. The park or apartment owner may bill tenants for their proportional share of the city’s charges for water and sewer service. It may also charge the tenants a monthly amount to recover the ordinary, necessary and reasonable cost of providing water and sewer service within the development.
2. The landlord must decide whether to include allowed charges in rent or to bill the tenant separately for those costs. It can’t do both.
3. The customer must maintain at the mobile home park or apartment building or complex required records...that will enable a tenant or the city to see what costs are included in allowed charges and how those charges are converted to a monthly billing amount, and what the city’s charges are each month and how the customer calculated each tenant’s pro-rata share of the city’s charges.
4. The customer may submit a monthly utility bill to the tenants. The bill must be delivered to the tenant in the month following the month when the customer receives a bill from the city. Sub-meter readings used to compute a pro-rata share must reflect water usage in the same month used to compute the city charges for water service or sewer service. This last provision will require customers to bill for sewer service based on water usage in January rather than charging for sewer service based on water usage each month, as was allegedly the case at Harold's Square.
5. The monthly utility bill must separately state the allowed charges and the city charges. This will enable a tenant to see how much of the City’s charges to the landlord are being charged to the tenant. The bill must tell the tenant where the Required Records are kept and that the tenant or the City can inspect and copy those records during normal business hours.
6. The ordinance allows a Customer to determine a tenant’s pro-rata share of allowed charges and city charges with or without the use of submeters. If submeters are not used, the pro-rata share shall be determined by dividing the monthly allowed charges and city charges by the number of mobile home spaces or apartments and common areas within the Multi-Unit Property which receive water or sewer service. If submeters are used, the Customer may only charge tenants for the amount of water the tenants actually use as measured by the submeters. If there are leaks or if water measured through the master meter is used for other purposes than consumption by tenants, the customer cannot pass the entire monthly chargefor water service to the tenants. The tenants share of the monthly charge is calculated by multiplying the total of all the submeter readings for the month by the volumetric charge used by the city to calculate the customer’s monthly bill (the “recoverable charges”). Each tenant’s Pro-Rata share of that amount is determined by dividing the tenant’s individual meter reading by the total submeter readings for that month and multiplying the recoverable charges by the resulting percentage or fraction. The pro-rata share of sewer charges is determined by dividing the tenant’s individual meter reading by the total submeter readings for the month used to determine the City’s sewer service charges (currently January) and multiplying the monthly sewer service charges by the resulting percentage or fraction.
7. A violation (is) an infraction punishable by a fine increasing from $100 to $500, for a first and subsequent offenses within one year. (It) also creates a civil remedy which any tenant or the city can pursue by filing a lawsuit against the landlord to recover actual damages, a penalty of $1,000 or 10% of actual damages, whichever is higher, and, in the case of willful violations, treble damages. In addition, the prevailing party in any such action can recover its attorneys’ fees.